LLMWise/Comparisons/GPT-5.2 vs Gemini 3 Flash
vsModel comparison

GPT-5.2 vs Gemini 3 Flash: Premium Power vs Lightning Speed

OpenAI's flagship meets Google's speed demon. We compare them across eight dimensions so you can pick the right tool. Then test it yourself with LLMWise Compare mode.

4
GPT-5.2
1
Tie
3
Gemini 3 Flash
Head-to-head by dimension
DimensionGPT-5.2Gemini 3 FlashEdge
Creative WritingGPT-5.2 is widely considered the best creative writing model, producing vivid, engaging prose with natural variety in tone and rhythm.Gemini 3 Flash can produce serviceable creative content but tends toward formulaic structure and lacks the stylistic range of premium models.
SpeedGPT-5.2 delivers solid speed for a frontier model but cannot compete with models specifically optimized for low latency.Gemini 3 Flash is significantly faster, often delivering complete responses in the time it takes GPT-5.2 to finish its first paragraph.
CostGPT-5.2 sits at premium pricing. For high-volume applications, costs can scale quickly without careful prompt engineering.Gemini 3 Flash is a fraction of the cost per token, making it the clear choice for cost-constrained or high-volume use cases.
MultimodalGPT-5.2 supports image input with strong visual reasoning and can describe, analyze, and answer questions about images accurately.Gemini 3 Flash has deeper multimodal integration, supporting images, video frames, and documents natively with fast processing.
CodingGPT-5.2 generates reliable, well-documented code and has a mature ecosystem of coding-focused features like function calling and structured outputs.Gemini 3 Flash writes functional code for common patterns but drops off in quality for complex, multi-step programming tasks.
General KnowledgeGPT-5.2 has a broad, deep knowledge base and handles trivia, factual questions, and domain-specific queries with high accuracy.Gemini 3 Flash has solid general knowledge backed by Google's training data, though it can be less precise on niche or technical topics.
Integration & EcosystemOpenAI's ecosystem is the most mature, with extensive documentation, a large community, and wide third-party tool support.Google's ecosystem is growing but still trails OpenAI in terms of third-party integrations, community resources, and plug-and-play tooling.
ReliabilityGPT-5.2 has occasional outages and rate limit issues during peak usage, though overall uptime has improved steadily.Gemini 3 Flash benefits from Google's infrastructure and tends to have consistent availability, though error messaging could be more helpful.tie
Verdict

GPT-5.2 is the stronger model for quality-sensitive tasks: creative writing, complex coding, and general knowledge queries. Gemini 3 Flash is the smarter choice when you need speed, low cost, or multimodal processing at scale. Many production systems benefit from using both, routing based on task requirements.

Use LLMWise Compare mode to test both models on your own prompts in one API call.

Common questions

Is Gemini 3 Flash good enough to replace GPT-5.2?
For many tasks, yes. Classification, summarization, translation, and simple Q&A often perform comparably on Gemini 3 Flash at a fraction of the cost. For creative writing, complex reasoning, and coding, GPT-5.2 still has a meaningful quality advantage.
Which model should I use for a chatbot?
It depends on the chatbot. Customer support bots that need fast, cost-effective responses work well with Gemini 3 Flash. A creative writing assistant or coding copilot would benefit from GPT-5.2's deeper capabilities.
How can I compare them on my own prompts?
Open LLMWise Compare mode, paste your prompt, and select GPT-5.2 and Gemini 3 Flash. Both responses stream in simultaneously with real-time latency and cost tracking so you can see the exact quality-speed-cost trade-off for your workload.

Try it yourself

500 free credits. One API key. Nine models. No credit card required.