Meta and Mistral are pushing the frontier of open-weight models. We compare their flagship offerings across seven dimensions. Test them yourself with LLMWise Compare mode.
| Dimension | Llama 4 Maverick | Mistral Large | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Open-Source Flexibility | Llama 4 Maverick benefits from Meta's permissive license and massive community. It can be fine-tuned, quantized, and self-hosted with extensive community tooling support. | Mistral Large uses a more restrictive license for its largest models. While still open-weight, the self-hosting and fine-tuning ecosystem is smaller than Llama's. | |
| Multi-Language Support | Llama 4 Maverick handles major languages well but is primarily optimized for English, with noticeable quality drops in lower-resource European and Asian languages. | Mistral Large has strong multilingual capabilities, especially across European languages, benefiting from Mistral's focus on serving a diverse European market. | |
| Coding | Llama 4 Maverick is a capable coding model that handles mainstream languages well and benefits from a large fine-tuning community creating specialized coding variants. | Mistral Large is competitive at coding, with strong Python and JavaScript generation, though it has a smaller set of specialized coding fine-tunes available. | tie |
| Reasoning | Llama 4 Maverick shows strong reasoning capabilities, particularly on tasks that benefit from chain-of-thought prompting and multi-step problem decomposition. | Mistral Large is a solid reasoner but tends to be slightly less consistent on complex, multi-step logical problems compared to Llama 4 Maverick. | |
| Cost | Llama 4 Maverick is very affordable through API providers and free to self-host, making it one of the most cost-effective frontier-adjacent models available. | Mistral Large is reasonably priced but generally more expensive than Llama 4 Maverick when accessed through comparable API providers. | |
| Speed | Llama 4 Maverick uses a mixture-of-experts architecture that enables fast inference, with active parameter counts kept efficient during generation. | Mistral Large also uses a MoE architecture and delivers competitive inference speed, with both models performing similarly on throughput benchmarks. | tie |
| Community & Ecosystem | Llama has the largest open-source LLM community by a wide margin, with thousands of fine-tunes, active forums, and deep integration across frameworks like vLLM, Ollama, and HuggingFace. | Mistral has a growing but smaller community. Its ecosystem is strongest in Europe, with good integration in Le Chat and enterprise-focused deployment tools. |
Llama 4 Maverick is the stronger choice for most developers, offering better open-source flexibility, a larger community, competitive reasoning, and lower cost. Mistral Large has a clear edge in multilingual capabilities, particularly for European languages, making it the better pick for internationalized applications. Both are solid open-weight alternatives to proprietary models.
Use LLMWise Compare mode to test both models on your own prompts in one API call.
500 free credits. One API key. Nine models. No credit card required.